Unlocking Profit Opportunities: Exploring Voluntary Delistings from NASDAQ

Voluntary Delisting From NASDAQ To Find Profits

How Do Delistings Work? Delistings occur when companies decide to delist their stock from stock exchanges in a move to privatize or move to the over-the-counter (OTC) markets. This process can happen through voluntary delistings or forced delistings.

  • Voluntary Delistings:
    • Occur when a company decides to purchase all its shares or move to an OTC market while complying with exchange requirements.
    • Investors should carefully watch these types of delistings.
  • Forced Delistings:
    • Occur when a company fails to meet the listing requirements mandated by the exchange.
    • Companies are usually notified 30 days before being delisted, and share prices may plunge as a result.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Voluntary Delisting Companies may choose to deregister for various reasons that can impact shareholders positively or negatively.

  • Advantages:
    • Capital Savings: Deregistering can save a company millions in costs and potentially increase net income and earnings per share.
    • Strategic Move: Companies may acquire their own shares to increase shareholder value in the short term.
    • Regulatory Concerns: Delisting can be driven by failure to meet listing requirements, but it may provide clear bottom-line incentives.

How to Profit from Delistings Investors can take advantage of delistings by focusing on companies that voluntarily delist to go private and cash out their shareholders. By identifying instances where small companies reduce their number of shareholders through reverse stock splits, investors can potentially earn significant returns.

  • Key Strategies:
    • Identify companies attempting to “cheat” the SEC by reducing their number of shareholders.
    • Look for opportunities where small shareholders can profit from cash compensation following reverse stock splits.

Finding Opportunities Investors can find delisting opportunities by reviewing publicly available filings with the SEC through the EDGAR database.

  • SEC Filings to Check:
    • 8-K Current Events: These filings announce delisting intentions, including initial stock split announcements.
    • Schedule 14A Proxy Statements: Proxy statements allow shareholders to vote on voluntary delistings.
    • S-1/F-1 Registration Statements: These filings provide details about new securities issued as a result of delisting.

The Bottom Line Delistings can offer profitable investment opportunities, but success depends on various factors. Investors who dedicate time and effort to researching delisting opportunities may discover high-performing assets in the short term.

Note: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 does not have a direct application to voluntary delistings. However, it is relevant in terms of increased disclosures and regulations that may impact companies’ decisions to delist.

Further Resources:

Websites and Online Resources:

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) – Official website of the SEC providing information on delistings and regulations: SEC Website
  2. NASDAQ Listing Center – Resource hub offering guidance and information on delistings from NASDAQ: NASDAQ Listing Center


  1. “Delisting and Voluntary Withdrawal of Listing: International Evidence” by Ahmet Can Kutlu and Raymond M. Leuthold – Explores the global landscape of delistings and provides insights into their implications: Book Link
  2. “Delisting: Causes, Consequences, and Implications” by Susanne Altendorfer-Kaiser – Examines the factors influencing delistings and their impact on companies and investors: Book Link

Academic Journals and Research Papers:

  1. “Voluntary Delisting and Its Determinants: Evidence from China” by Tianxiang Cao and Li Jiang – A scholarly study analyzing the factors driving voluntary delistings in the Chinese market: Research Paper Link
  2. “Delisting and Its Wealth Effects: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange” by Moh’d R. Alnsour, Natalia Isachenkova, and Tomasz Mickiewicz – A research paper investigating the wealth effects of delistings on firms listed on the London Stock Exchange: Research Paper Link

Reports and Studies:

  1. “Delisting and Going Private: An Overview” by NYU Stern School of Business – Provides an overview of delisting and going private transactions, exploring the motives and consequences: Report Link
  2. “Delisting and Its Impact on Stock Returns: Evidence from BSE” by Prachi Kaur Sahni and Ruchika Bhatia – A study examining the impact of delistings on stock returns in the Indian market: Study Link

Professional Organizations and Associations:

  1. National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) – An association dedicated to advancing the practice of investor relations, offering resources and insights on corporate actions like delistings: NIRI Website
  2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) – A professional organization for CPAs, providing guidance and resources related to financial reporting and compliance, including delistings: AICPA Website

Please note that some resources may require subscription or purchase to access the full content.

Going Private: Exploring the Implications and Advantages of Privatization for Public Companies

Why Public Companies Go Private: Exploring the Decision-Making Process


Public companies sometimes choose to go private due to various reasons, weighing the advantages and disadvantages associated with this decision. Going private entails freedom from costly and time-consuming regulatory requirements, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). This article delves into the factors that companies consider before going private and provides insights into the implications of such a transition.

The Benefits and Challenges of Being a Public Company

Advantages of Public Companies:

  • Liquidity: The buying and selling of public company shares offer investors a liquid asset.
  • Prestige: Being publicly traded implies operational and financial size and success, especially on major stock exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange.

Challenges of Public Companies:

  • Regulatory Compliance: Public companies are subject to numerous regulatory, administrative, financial reporting, and corporate governance bylaws, shifting management’s focus away from core operations.
  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: SOX, enacted in response to corporate failures like Enron and Worldcom, imposes compliance and administrative rules on publicly traded companies. Section 404, in particular, requires the implementation and testing of internal controls over financial reporting at all levels of the organization.
  • Quarterly Earnings Expectations: Public companies must meet Wall Street’s quarterly earnings expectations, potentially diverting attention from long-term functions such as research and development, capital expenditures, and pension funding.
  • Pension Fund Issues: Some public companies have manipulated financial statements, compromising employees’ pension funds by projecting overly optimistic anticipated returns.

Understanding the Transition: Going Private

Definition of “Take-Private” Transaction:

  • In a “take-private” transaction, a private-equity group or consortium acquires the stock of a publicly traded corporation.
  • Due to the substantial size of most public companies, acquiring companies often require financing from investment banks or lenders to facilitate the purchase.
  • The acquiring private-equity group uses the target company’s operating cash flow to repay the debt incurred during the acquisition.

Benefits of Going Private:

  • Reduced Regulatory Burden: Private companies are relieved from the costly and time-consuming requirements of regulatory frameworks such as SOX.
  • Resource Allocation: Private companies can allocate more resources to research and development, capital expenditures, and pension funding, as they face fewer external reporting obligations.

The Role of Private Equity Groups:

  • Financing and Returns: Private equity groups secure financing from banks or lenders and aim to provide sufficient returns for their shareholders.
  • Leveraging: Leveraging the acquired company reduces the amount of equity needed for the acquisition, enhancing capital gains for investors.
  • Business Plan: After the acquisition, management outlines a business plan that demonstrates how the company will generate returns for its investors.

Factors Influencing the Decision to Go Private:

  • Relationships with Private Equity Firms: Investment banks, financial intermediaries, and senior management build relationships with private equity firms to explore partnership opportunities.
  • Premium Over Stock Price: Acquirers typically offer a premium of 20% to 40% over the current stock price, attracting CEOs and managers of public companies who are incentivized by stock appreciation.
  • Shareholder Pressure: Shareholders, particularly those with voting rights, often urge the board of directors and senior management to complete a deal that increases the value of their equity holdings.
  • Long-Term Outlook: Management must balance short-term considerations with the company’s future prospects, assessing factors such as the financial partner’s compatibility, leverage, and cash flow sustainability.
  • Acquirer Evaluation: Scrutinizing the acquirer’s track record is crucial, considering factors like leverage practices, industry familiarity, sound projections, level of involvement in company stewardship, and exit strategies.

Market Conditions and Going Private:

  • Credit Availability: The ease of borrowing funds for acquisitions depends on market conditions. In favorable credit markets, more private-equity firms can acquire public companies, while tightening credit markets make debt more expensive and lead to fewer take-private transactions.


The decision for a public company to go private involves weighing the advantages and challenges associated with regulatory compliance, earnings expectations, and other factors. Going private relieves companies from burdensome regulatory requirements like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, allowing them to allocate resources more efficiently. Acquiring private-equity groups play a vital role in financing and implementing business plans, while management must carefully evaluate the potential acquirer’s track record. Ultimately, the decision to go private requires a thorough assessment of the company’s long-term outlook and market conditions.

Advantages and Drawbacks of Privatization: Understanding the Implications

Advantages of Privatization:

  1. Focus on Business Operations: Going private allows management to concentrate on running and growing the business without the burden of complying with regulatory requirements like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). This enables the senior leadership team to enhance the company’s competitive positioning in the market.
  2. Flexible Reporting Requirements: Private companies can tailor reporting obligations to meet the needs of private investors, allowing internal and external assurance, legal professionals, and consulting professionals to focus on relevant reporting requirements.
  3. Long-Term Focus: Privatization frees management from the pressure of meeting quarterly earnings expectations. This longer-term horizon allows management to prioritize activities that create sustainable shareholder wealth, such as implementing process improvement initiatives and investing in sales staff training.
  4. Utilization of Resources: Private companies have more time and financial resources at their disposal, which can be allocated to initiatives like process improvements, research and development, and capital expenditures.

Drawbacks of Privatization:

  1. Excessive Leverage Risks: Private equity firms that employ excessive leverage to fund acquisitions can expose the company to financial risks. Economic downturns, increased competition, or missed revenue milestones can severely impact the organization’s ability to service its debt.
  2. Capital Constraints: If a privatized company struggles to service its debt, its bonds may be downgraded to junk status. This makes it challenging to raise debt or equity capital for vital investments in capital expenditures, expansion, or research and development, hindering long-term success and competitive differentiation.
  3. Limited Liquidity: Shares of private companies do not trade on public exchanges, resulting in reduced liquidity for investors. The availability of buyers for equity stakes can vary, making it more difficult to sell investments, especially if exit dates are specified in the privacy covenants.


Going private offers several advantages for public companies, including reduced regulatory obligations, increased flexibility in reporting, and the ability to focus on long-term goals. However, the drawbacks of excessive leverage, capital constraints, and limited liquidity need to be carefully managed. By maintaining reasonable debt levels, preserving free cash flow, and utilizing resources effectively, privatized companies can benefit from the freedom to prioritize strategic initiatives and create sustainable value for shareholders in the long run.

Additional Resources:

Websites and Online Resources:

  1. U.S. Congress. “H.R.3763 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002” – Link
  2. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Study of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 404, Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Requirements” – Link


  1. “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: A Brief Introduction” by Guy L. Fardone
  2. “Sarbanes-Oxley For Dummies” by Jill Gilbert Welytok and Mark R. Williams

Academic Journals and Research Papers:

  1. Hope, Ole-Kristian, and Wayne B. Thomas. “Managerial Empire Building and Firm Disclosure.” Journal of Accounting Research 49, no. 5 (2011): 1091-1123.
  2. Carcello, Joseph V., and Terry L. Neal. “Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting.” The Accounting Review 81, no. 3 (2006): 823-849.

Reports and Studies:

  1. Ernst & Young. “Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: A Guide for Management by Internal Controls Practitioners.” (2018) – Link
  2. PricewaterhouseCoopers. “Going private: Unlocking value in a changing business environment.” (2017) – Link

Professional Organizations and Associations:

  1. Financial Executives International (FEI) – Link
  2. National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) – Link

These resources offer authoritative information and valuable insights for readers seeking further information on the topic of going private, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and related considerations.